I have spent 40 years choosing distinguished vineyard sites, planting them with the right variety, refining the viticulture and the winemaking and enduring the swings and roundabouts of the third party critical assessment of the wines. Like any parent I take offense when my wines (aka my alternative children) don’t achieve the points and accolades I think they deserve. Like any good parent I know my children aren’t perfect but I have a better idea of where their strengths and weaknesses are than any external reviewer.
My children/wines are different. There are ponderous swings of the fashion pendulum in the Australian fine wine endeavour. In the 90’s the massively over-oaked big company red wines were the critics’ choice and then in the early 2000’s the over-ripe, dead fruit wines of the Parker push took over the imagination of the critics. Through all of that time Petaluma stuck to the low crop, open canopy, hand pruned, hand picked and subtly oaked model that best displayed the terroir characteristics of the Evans Vineyard and Coonawarra. This model inevitably involved the perfectly correct, ever so slightly leafy genetic expression of Cabernet Sauvignon elicited by the cool Coonawarra climate. Because of the infatuation with over-ripe characters any leafiness was condemned, except of course in great Bordeaux where it was excused as a regional character. Petaluma Coonawarra never achieved the secondary market values of the porty Shiraz wines that dominated the Langtons hierarchy but they have outlasted them by a distance and they are still going. And they will keep going way beyond their current 20 plus years. 1988, 1990, 1992, 1995 1998 and 2000 are some of the highlight vintages and you can buy them at auction for less than current release price. That amazes me especially whenever I open one of those old Petaluma bottles and my knowledgeable friends compare them to great aged Bordeaux, indeed many times they are better than the same vintage Bordeaux when compared side by side.
I can hear Ann say move on, so I will.
Australian Chardonnay has just undergone one of those ponderous fashion swings and ended up in a much better place. Again the over-ripe and over-oaked wines from warm vineyards of the penultimate two decades has given way to cool climate Chardonnay in this decade. The pendulum of course has over swung to the early picked (aka green cucumber), artifact laden (think struck match and flint), flavourless wines that dominated the reviews over the past decade and still receive some favour. Chardonnay is nothing without flavour and texture, that’s what separates it from all other white varieties making it arguably the greatest white variety of all with apologies to the delicate and noble Riesling variety.
Throughout the pendulum swings it has been my life’s mission to make great Chardonnay to vie with the best from Burgundy, Sonoma Coast and wherever great Chardonnay is grown. That’s why we came to the Tiers Vineyard in the very cool and wet Piccadilly Valley in 1978 and planted the wonderful OF clone of Chardonnay on close spacing with vertical manicured canopy, unlike any other vineyard at that time.
My philosophy has always been to minimize winemaking impact to allow the vineyard terroir to best express through the variety to which it is ultimately suited.
Part of that philosophy has been to make no sudden moves, to incrementally change things in the vineyard and winery over the years as experience provides a window to improvement. That has been a 40-year project.
So when one of my Wine Australia colleagues expressed amazement at how good the Tapanappa Tiers Chardonnay is and that I must have changed the winemaking radically I know he had not tasted Tapanappa Tiers Chardonnay often, recently or at all. When I answered “no the winemaking has remained much the same through all of the iterations of Tapanappa Tiers Chardonnay” I could hear the disbelief in his voice.
Which brings me to the big change in the profile of Tapanappa Tiers Chardonnay and to the substance of the title of this rant, “A Small Boast”.
Partly by accident and partly by design Tapanappa has begun to enter selected wine competitions. It has been a well known fact that I have resisted putting Petaluma and then Tapanappa in competitions and there are personal reasons for that that relate to my despair at the fashion swings that rule competitions.
Well guess what?
Tapanappa Tiers Chardonnay keeps winning the competitions across its vintages and different styles of judging.
Below is a summary of the performance of Tapanappa Tiers Chardonnay across the very credible Drinks Business (UK) Masters Competition, the UK Sommellier’s competition and the Decanter World Wine Awards.
I couldn’t be prouder than to achieve the Best in Show of the 17,000 entry, Decanter Wine Awards against wines from all great Chardonnay regions of the globe. I have to remind myself of something the great head winemaker of Orlando, Gunther Prass is reported to have said to his staff after Orlando had swept the competition at an Australian wine show and I paraphrase,
“beware that the height of your elation at these victories is the depth to which you will plunge when you inevitably fail at the next wine-show.”
I am wary.
- 2017 Drinks Business Masters-2015 Tapanappa Tiers Chardonnay – Gold
- 2017 Drinks Business Asian Masters-2015 Tapanappa Tiers Chardonny-Master – equal Top
- 2017 Decanter World Wine Awards-2015 Tapanappa Tiers Chardonnay – Platinum and best Australian Chardonnay (runner-up for Best in Show)
- 2018 Drinks Business Masters- 2016 Tapanappa Tiers Chardonnay – Gold
- 2018 UK Sommelliers awards-2016 Tapanappa Tiers Chardonnay – Gold and Critics Choice (top wine)
- 2018 Decanter World Wine Awards-2016 Tapanappa Tiers Chardonnay – Platinum and Best in Show
I do hope you forgive the small boast and I remain ever hopeful Tapanappa Tiers Chardonnay will one day not be treated as was the prophet in his own land.